ARKHIMAR RESOURCE

Contractor/Tender Comparison Scorecard

Compare submissions using transparent criteria and weights.

A documented comparison structure without an automated contractor recommendation.

To organize comparable evidence before a formal selection decision.

What is included

  • Configurable evaluation criteria
  • Weight and score columns
  • Assumption notes
  • Decision record prompts
  • Professional review reminder

Worksheet preview

Evaluation setup

  • Define mandatory pass/fail requirements before scoring.
  • Choose criteria and weights totalling 100%.
  • Record the evidence expected for every criterion.

Suggested criteria

  • Relevant experience and proposed team
  • Methodology, programme and capacity
  • Commercial submission and exclusions
  • Quality, safety and risk approach
  • References, clarifications and compliance evidence

Decision control

  • Score every bidder on the same published scale.
  • Add an evidence reference and assessor comment beside each score.
  • Treat weighted totals as decision support, not an automatic recommendation.
  • Record due diligence, the authorized decision and approval date.

Professional boundary: Planning aid only. It is not planning approval, legal advice, statutory approval, cost certification or a substitute for project-specific professional services.